First - nothing that I write below is meant to in any way diminish what Vanderbilt achieved yesterday. They totally deserved to win that game. They bullied Alabama on offense, dictated the pace of the game, dominated time of possession and won the turnover battle 2-0. That was the recipe for success, and they executed brilliantly. Congratulations to everyone associated with the program for a historical win.
Notwithstanding the above, I believe that they were only "allowed" to win that game because of this year's move to the 12-team playoff. Last year, when only 4 teams made the playoff, there is no way that the SEC would have allowed Alabama to lose to Vanderbilt as that likely would have been seen as disqualifying for Alabama to make the playoffs. But, this year, the SEC is looking at a virtual guaranteed 3 teams making the playoffs (GA, AL, TX) with many others in contention for another 2-3 spots (Miss, TAM, Ark, OK, LSU, MO, TN). A loss to Vanderbilt doesn't meaningfully jeopardize Alabama's chances of being in the Top 12, so the SEC could "let them play" yesterday. I am quite certain that last year there would have been a couple of calls made to facilitate an Alabama victory - maybe Capers' sack would have drawn a bogus personal foul for a high hit or unnecessary roughness or there would have been a holding call made to insure that Vanderbilt didn't score that last TD.
Thoughts?