ADVERTISEMENT

On Jason Edwards

Just got off the phone with Jason Edwards. You guys will love his edge and what he had to say. Can't say I've spoken to a player with as much confidence in himself as Edwards has.

Preview:
"My competitive spirit is as high as ever. I don't know if I just hate to lose or love to win but I'm out there trying to win. I'm fighting all game. I'm fighting for 40 minutes. 45 if we going into overtime. I think that I'm an electric scorer. I feel like I'm real dynamic, that's probably the most basketball used term with me. I'm dynamic. I guard, I shoot at a high clip, I score at a high clip, I can score at all three levels. I'm just a leader. You'll just see for me out there we're never gonna have a dull moment. We never gonna have a moment where we're apart, where we don't play as a team. Everybody is gonna be locked in because we know we need everybody on the team, we need managers. We need everybody to be at their best to be the Sweet 16 team that we're trying to be."

Basketball The state of the basketball roster

I started to post this in another thread but thought I'd do it here in a new thread.

You need 9-10 guys who can play at this level.

From the guys eligible to return, they have exactly one (1) who we know can. That's Ven Allen Lubin. They've got him back.

Collin Smith, if he's healed, could be one of the 9-10. But Achilles injuries are tricky; Mike Soroka (baseball player) had his career wrecked because of one..

Jason Rivera-Torres, if Stack didn't destroy his confidence, could also be one.

So both are "ifs" and both are in the portal at the moment.

Looks like JQ Roberts is back. Had a true shooting percentage of 46% and scored under 7 points per 40 minutes, and pulled under 7 boards per 40 minutes. Maybe that gets better, maybe it doesn't. I don't think I can put him in that 9-10 group yet based on what I've seen.

Which leaves him with a foundation of exactly one "certain" guy (Lubin) and two "maybes" if they're back.

And that "certainty" is probably the third or fourth-best player on your typical 8- or 9-seeded team in the NCAAs.

I'm not sure what they have in Tyler Tanner or Karris Bilal so we'll call them unknowns.

So again, that leaves Byington with one bankable commodity with which to start. It's probably more than that (maybe a freshman hits, maybe they get back a productive JRT, some combination of all that), but again, so maybe it's one or maybe it's three or four. But either way, that's a horrible starting point, especially when only one of those guys is a starting-level player on a good team and the others are more in that 6-to-10 range in terms of filling out that 9-10.

As for the additions...

- Tyler Nickel scored 14.6 points per 40 minutes, had about 1.5 assists to every turnover, had an effective field goal mark of 57%, shot 82% from the line. Didn't seem to do much else, had a defensive rating of 109. I'm confident he's one of those 9-10 guys but probably more in the 4-7 range on a good team.

- Grant Huffman is a point guard who's logged 3,020 career minutes and had 5.3 assists to 2.1 turnovers. Decent foul shooter (72%) last year but a below-average (thought not awful--48% eFG) mark last year. Defensive rating of 102 last year, so that's probably an improvement over what they had a year ago excepting Manjon. If you can check some other boxes with shooters (and Nickel gets one of those) then he's definitely among the 9-10 guys and probably in that 3-5 range (3.8 win shares last year suggests that also).

- Jaylen Carry scored 18.8 points, pulled 11.4 board, had 1.8 steals and 0.8 blocks per 40 minutes and had an elite effective field goal mark (69%) as well as defensive rating (95). Free throws (51%) were another matter but I see a ton of stuff to love here given he's a sophomore. How does that translate to a bigger role on a bigger stage? I don't know but he's absolutely in that 9-10 and probably the upper half of that group.

- MJ Collins had an assist-to-turnover ratio over 2, but an abysmal eFG (40%) and a 108 defensive rating that isn't great, either. But he is an 84% foul shooter and did log the third-most minutes on a top-60 KenPom team and so maybe there's something intangible there that suggests more value than meets the eye. Does he meet that criteria of 9-10 guys? I'd say so, probably as a backup point guard though probably your 8th or 9th guy.

So , that's five guys who can help for sure, maybe more depending on the variables where I started.

Where that leaves them as I see it:

- They absolutely need a volume scorer who can shoot it reasonably efficiently, someone who can be a best-player-on-the-team type.

- They probably need another Nickel-type contributor from an efficient-scoring standpoint. (Maybe that's JRT?) who starts or is the first guy off the bench.

- They probably need at least one more quality big.

- Maybe one more guy who does something of value to fit in that top 9-10 depending on whether a freshman hits or whether Smith or JRT return.

Feel free to pick this apart as needed, but this is how I look at roster building.

Basketball Updated - Basketball Roster now and how do we finish?

Here is my as of today guesses as to who would start and in what roles:

PG - Grant Huffman 12.8 ppg 5.1 rpg 5.3 apg
2/Combo - Jason Edwards - 19.1 ppg 2 apg
3 - Tyler Nickel - 8.8 ppg 2.2 rpg 1.3 apg
F - Devin McGlockton - 10.2 ppg 6.3 rpg
F - VA Lubin - 12.3 ppg 6.3 rpg

F - Jaylen Carey - 7 ppg 4.3 rpg in 14.9 mpg
CG - MJ Collins - 7.4 ppg 2.8 rpg 2.7 apg
CG - Tyler Tanner - 26.2 ppg in HS
CG - Karris Bilal - 26 ppg in HS
F - JQ Roberts - Raw

So it looks like we have 3 spots left and are probably about out of NIL.

If I had a preference it would be to get:

1 or 2 more scorers / shooters

1-2 bigs over 6'9, even if they are just backups to be able to play different styles.


What am I missing?

Football Vanderbilt football finally for the first time in 75 years has an (relatively) even playing field

We are no longer going to let guys take up scholarships and milk the degree for 4 years. If they are not contributing they will be pushed out and replaced. We no longer will sit around and watch virtually every other school pay players and break the rules. We will now pay players above board like everyone else. We will mix and match players, plug holes, transfers galore, immediate eligibility. These are seismic changes. Yes we still have academic restrictions but it’s obvious we are more flexible. Throw in the Tennessee state proposal to allow Universities pay players direct and you can see Vanderbilt can really ascend to a level we haven’t seen in 75 years. Finish with some major facilities projects….It really is an unthinkable and unimaginable scenario even a couple of years ago.

There’s a funny late 1970s photo of Howard Cosell flanked by Bruce Jenner and OJ Simpson on a broadcast and the caption reads “I am Howard Cosell. I come from the future. You would not believe me if I told you what happened to these two.” Who would have believed what has happened to the potential of Vanderbilt football a mere 2 years ago.

MBB scheduling: Could Byington derail everything from the start?

Thanks to @HMHS for broaching a topic that deserves its own thread. I'm experimenting with clickbaity headlines. Short answer: No, not going to run it off the rails. :)

It will be interesting to see how [M By] schedules the team in Year 1.

I have more thoughts on this than anyone wants to read. Let's start with approaches, variables to try to maximize:

  1. NCAA résumé
  2. Cohesion as a team (new coach, mostly new players{
  3. Fan excitement
  4. Recruiting synergy
Some of these are countervailing. Some are more or less important, or more or less sensitive to scheduling philosophy.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT