Seriously -- it has to be April 1. There's no way that Turner just tied his own future to Mason's.
I think that the `we have 50 years of' should actually be continued with `incompetent AD's who lack vision, making horrific personnel decisions for the football program.'
Only thoughts that I could come up with are:
1) No Chancellor means no kill-fee on contract
2) Turner is as lost as Mason is
3) We are going to go D3
4) There's a donor that likes Mason
5) Losing is going to become part of our brand
6) Mason is a gifted salesman
Any other logical explanations?
I think that the `we have 50 years of' should actually be continued with `incompetent AD's who lack vision, making horrific personnel decisions for the football program.'
Only thoughts that I could come up with are:
1) No Chancellor means no kill-fee on contract
2) Turner is as lost as Mason is
3) We are going to go D3
4) There's a donor that likes Mason
5) Losing is going to become part of our brand
6) Mason is a gifted salesman
Any other logical explanations?
