We've got some great commits and more well-regarded potential prospects in the pipeline. However, we also have what appears to be the same volume of unrated, low-rated, unimpressive offer list type guys too. How much of a pass are we giving the new staff because a) they're new; and b) Barton? I just think if Mason's staff was offering these same guys, there'd be a litany of posts complaining about it.
Are we seeing anything different with the 2nd group of prospects (as defined above) that's different from prior years?
Please try to refrain from turning this into a Mason-bashing thread, I'd love to just discuss the recruits/process.
Are we seeing anything different with the 2nd group of prospects (as defined above) that's different from prior years?
Please try to refrain from turning this into a Mason-bashing thread, I'd love to just discuss the recruits/process.
